Lieutenant S’ was a crack sniper in the Israeli army. About 9 months ago, he was severely wounded in Gaza by a Palestinian sniper. He took two bullets, which penetrated vital organs.

S’, whose name has not been released for security reasons, was not expected to survive.

A former martial arts expert, S’ was fully conscious when he reached hospital. Within 5 months, he had left his recuperation unit, a near record time. Although confined to his wheelchair, he successfully pushed to be inducted in an officer’s course. And, having passed with honours, he has returned to his crack unit.

Hollywood loves stories like this. Remember the film about the first American black navy diver, who defeated racism and then overcame the loss of a leg? What in hell drives these people ? And why insist on returning to places, where they had already lost limbs?

I do not know if there is a definitive answer. S’ is currently fighting his next war against accepted medical principal, determined to abandon his wheelchair one day.

Somewhere, mixed up in all the pain and the sentiments of heroics is a basic feeling or deep need to “do good”. In other words, people like this just want to serve their country, to protect their fellow citizens, whenever and whatever it takes.

They have been brought up with a deep motivation to succeed. And when that success can be shared by the whole country, they know that they have accomplished something morally good, which an be passed on to others.

During the fighting in Gaza, around 1,250 Palestinians were killed. The IDF has named all of them, of whom about 2/3 were combatants. Palestinians sources put the figure at about 1.400, but the stat is open to questioning.

I gather that S’ lives not far from me. As a result of the war, another neighbour did not return from the battle. Others were injured. All of them shared one thing in common – a burning desire to contribute. They understood that Israel’s security is won through being prepared and by defending the country through honour and by all legal means.

Israeli troops have long since withdrawn from Gaza, although the shelling of southern towns by Hamas continues sporadically. Meanwhile, Israel’s critics are having a field day. The UN has appointed a commission to investigate possible excesses by the Israeli military, although no inquiry has considered the role of Hamas sending rockets against population centres.

The international media has consistently lambasted Israeli units for not taking into account the needs of innocent civilians in the field of battle. Yet concurrently, there were wars in Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Iraq, and in several African countries. For all the inconsistencies and abuses in these conflicts, no inquiries have been launched. You do not find any investigative reporters from the Sunday Times or the New York Times.

The Israeli army has announced that it is investigating 14 separate incidents of possible abuse by soldiers. No other army in the world has such a transparent system. No questions are asked in Westminster or in Congress about possible misdemeanours by NATO troops.

The UK’s leading journal for black people, The Voice, recently claimed abuses against blacks in Israeli prisons. The article was soon pulled from the website after it was found to be ridden with factual errors.

And so the ritual of this unethical mock trial continues. Maybe the true Hollywood story is not the heroics of S’. What the scriptwriters should look for are the facts hidden from view by those who should be writing about them every day. S’ merely symbolises what 99.9% of Israelis think and how they try to behave day after day, despite the mistrials and hypocrisies of others.

Three pieces of news have been released recently on the Palestinian economy.

The most encouraging comes from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Real economic growth (GDP) is expected to rise by 9% in 2009. When you compare that to Israel (around -1.0% or less) and to the UK (at -2.5%), that is remarkable.

This change is promoted by:

  • The removal of many Israel security restrictions, resulting from  a decline in Palestinian violence.
  • Increased trade between Israel and the Palestinian sector – not just in goods, but also in high tech.

Still lacking is a more open, transparent regulatory financial system. This has yet to be implemented by the Palestinian Authority (PA), despite repeated annual demands of the IMF.

The report had been preceded by the announcement of the World Bank, which intends to contribute an additional US$33.5m to Palestinians in Gaza. The money will be directed primarily towards infrastructure projects. An agreement was signed with the PA’s Prime Minister, an internationally respected economist.

There is no issue over whether the money is needed. What hangs over the investment like a bad smell is the question of transparency.

The PA has no representation in Gaza, which is under the authoritarian control of Hamas. Who can guarantee that the money, effectively given by Western taxpayers, will be used properly and not diverted as has happened in the past? This remain a cause for great concern, yet to be broached by scared politicians.

 As if to emphasise the point, a third piece of news was revealed. The President and Foreign Minister of Greece have unwittingly been part of scam to raise money for a hospital in Gaza. The contributions totalled over US$1.5m.

Problem no’ 1: No such hospital existed. Problem no 2: Nobody can trace the money.

Bassma Eid is a rare individual. He is passionate about the rights of Palestinians.

And for Bassam that means that ordinary Palestinians have been mistreated by both Israelis and by their own brothers. His Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group has never been welcomed by the authorities in Ramallah. 

I first caught up with Bassam around 5 years ago. He had recently been released from a hellish period in a Palestinian prison, incarcerated for openly criticising Chairman Arafat. Clearly the torture did not dull his appetite for campaigning, as he demands that a true peace in the Middle East will only be made between democracies. Here the Palestinians are in deficit.

Bassam’s latest campaign centres around the continued corruption in the Palestinian Authority (PA). He openly questions why so much money is needed for salaries on behalf of people, who do not seem to exist.

This is not an isolated cry for help. Back in April 2009, AMAN, (the Palestinian Coalition for Accountability and Integrity) found that “corruption is still rampant in Palestinian society. Despite some positive reforms in the area of public fund management, there is still a general weakness in the system of combating corruption”.

Aman commissioner Azmi Shueibi said the Palestinian public in general believes that corruption increased in 2008.

Say no more……..to Obama and the EU who are still donating a billion dollars of taxpayers’ money to the PA and affiliated public bodies.

Yesterday, I commented about the freedom to protest on the streets of Jerusalem.

I have just received a translation of an article, posted in the Israeli newspaper Ma’ariv from 22nd June. The authors pose a simple question: Six months ago, many commentators around the world were demanding that Israel be sanctioned over its actions in Gaza. Today, re Iran, those same voices are silent.

It is not the shame that stinks. Nor even the hypocrisy. These people originally spoke out in the name of human rights. Clearly, that was a lie, an abuse of the phrase for ulterior motives. Their true interest was the denigration of Israel, the one true democracy in the Middle East.

Below is a copy of the translation, as I received it:

Where is Everyone? 

Ma’ariv (Monday, June 22, 09) by Ben Caspit and Ben-Dror Yemini (opinion) –

 

Tell us, where is everyone?  Where did all the people who demonstrated against Israel’s brutality in Operation Cast Lead, in the Second Lebanon War, in Operation Defensive Shield, or even in The Hague, when we were dragged there unwillingly after daring to build a separation barrier between us and the suicide bombers, disappear to?  We see demonstrations here and there, but these are mainly Iranian exiles.  Europe, in principle, is peaceful and calm.  So is the United States. Here and there a few dozens, here and there a few hundreds.  Have they evaporated because it is Tehran and not here?

   

All the peace-loving and justice-loving Europeans, British professors in search of freedom and equality, the friends filling the newspapers, magazines and various academic journals with various demands for boycotting Israel, defaming Zionism and blaming us and it for all the ills and woes of the world—could it be that they have taken a long summer vacation?

 

Now of all times, when the Basij hooligans have begun to slaughter innocent civilians in the city squares of Tehran?  Aren’t they connected to the Internet?  Don’t they have YouTube?  Has a terrible virus struck down their computer?  Have their justice glands been removed in a complicated surgical procedure (to be re-implanted successfully for the next confrontation in Gaza)?  How can it be that when a Jew kills a Muslim, the entire world boils, and when extremist Islam slaughters its citizens, whose sole sin is the aspiration to freedom, the world is silent?

   

Imagine that this were not happening now in Tehran, but rather here. Let’s say in Nablus.  Spontaneous demonstrations of Palestinians turning into an ongoing bloodbath.  Border Policemen armed with knives, on motorcycles, butchering demonstrators.  A young woman downed by a sniper in midday, dying before the cameras.  Actually, why imagine?  We can just recall what happened with the child Mohammed a-Dura.  How the affair (which was very harsh, admittedly) swept the world from one end to another.  The fact that a later independent investigative report raised tough questions as to the identity of the weapon from which a-Dura was shot, did not make a difference to anyone.  The Zionists were to blame, and that was that.

   

And where are the world’s leaders?  Where is the wondrous rhetorical ability of Barack Obama?  Where has his sublime vocabulary gone?  Where is the desire, that is supposed to be built into all American presidents, to defend and act on behalf of freedom seekers around the globe?  What is this stammering?

   

A source who is connected to the Iranian and security situation, said yesterday that if Obama had shown on the Iranian matter a quarter of the determination with which he assaulted the settlements in the territories, everything would have looked different.  “The demonstrators in Iran are desperate for help,” said the man, who served in very senior positions for many years, “they need to know that they have backing, that there is an entire world that supports them, but instead they see indifference.  And this is happening at such a critical stage of this battle for the soul of Iran and the freedom of the Iranian people.  It’s sad.”

   

Or the European Union, for example. The organization that speaks of justice and peace all year round.  Why should its leaders not declare clearly that the world wants to see a democratic and free Iran, and support it unreservedly?  Could it be20that the tongue of too many Europeans is still connected to dark places?  The pathetic excuse that such support would give Khamenei and Ahmadinejad an excuse to call the demonstrators “Western agents,” does not hold water.  They call them “Western agents” in any case, so what difference does it make?

   

To think that just six months ago, when Europe was flooded with demonstrations against Israel, leftists and Islamists raised pictures of Nasrallah, the protégé of the ayatollah regime.  The fact that this was a benighted regime did not trouble them.  This is madness, but it is sinking in and influencing the weary West.  If there is a truly free world here, let it appear immediately!  And impose sanctions, for example, on those who slaughter the members of their own people.  Just as it imposed them on North Korea, or on the military regime in Burma.  It is only a question of will, not of ability.

   

Apparently, something happens to the global adherence to justice and equality, when it comes to Iran.  The oppression is overt and known.  The Internet era broadcasts everything live, and it is all for the better.  Hooligans acting on behalf of the regime shoot and stab masses of demonstrators, who cry out for freedom.

   

Is anything more needed?  Apparently it is.  Because it is to no avail.  The West remains indifferent.  Obama is polite.  Why shouldn’t he be, after all, he aspires to a dialogue with the ayatollahs.  And that is very fine and good, the problem is that at this stage there is no dialogue, but there is death and murder on the streets.  At this stage, one must forget the rules of etiquette for a moment.  The voices being heard from Obama elicit concern that we are actually dealing with a new version of Chamberlain.

   

Being conciliatory is a positive trait, particularly when it follows the clumsy bellicosity of George Bush, but when conciliation becomes blindness, we have a problem.

   

The courageous voice of Angela Merkel, who issued yesterday a firm statement of support for the Iranian people and its right to freedom, is in the meantime a lone voice in the Western wilderness.  It is only a shame that she has not announced an economic boycott, in light of the fact that this is the European country that is most invested in building infrastructure in Iran.  She was joined by British Foreign Secretary Miliband.  It is little, it is late, it is not enough.  Millions of freedom seekers have taken to the streets in Iran, and the West is straddling the fence, one leg here, the other leg there.

   

There is a different Islam.  This is already clear today.  Even in Iran.  There are millions of Muslims who support freedom, human rights, equality for women.  These millions loathe Khamenei, Chavez and Nasrallah too.  But part of the global left wing prefers the ayatollah regime over them.  The main thing is for them to raise flags against Israel and America.  The question is why the democrats, the liberals, and Obama, Blair and Sarkozy, are continuing to sit on the fence.  This is not a fence of separation, it is a fence of shame. 

Visit Jerusalem and you come to a city where you walk on history.

In the Old City, you can wander back thousands of years. In the newer parts of the city, geopolitics storms out at you from every corner. And in any one of the main streets, you can find people of several religions streaming towards you.

Sit in your internet cafe and complain about the Israeli political system, well you will be typing away with no fear that a policeman is looking over your shoulder with a baton, as in Iran.

This week, Jerusalem has proved that it is more than just a centre to the 3 main religions. Yesterday, Thursday, a gay parade took place. Yes, it did anger leaders of all religions. Yet I went into the night life area, later in the evening. The atmosphere was definitely one of fun and good will.

Today, the ultra orthodox will protest the opening of a car park on the Sabbath. I have many reservations about their aims and methods, however they will be protesting when most others in the Middle East can only dream of the opportunity.

Opposite these devout Jews will be standing a group of youths, dressed in jeans and tanktops, demanding greater pluralism.

Free speech – in Jerusalem or in Israel per se – is a precious gift. It must be protected, and not abused. When people complain about Israel and its so-called treatment of Palestinians, they rarely apply the same principles in reverse. Amnesty International feels that Israel should release political prisoners, but its silence over the abuse of Gilad Shalit is reprehensible.

Here, the choice of silence is as unacceptable as repression of free speech.

It’s a cauldron, but Jerusalem is a great place to live, because her freedom is available to all – for all to respect its precious status.

Check out all the links to Israel on WordPress, bloggers paradise, and you will find tens of entries everyday.

Most of the authors impart bile. They hate Israel. You tell them that Israel is the one democratic country in the region, with a growing Christian population, and a medical system open to all, and and and …..you might as well be talking to a brick wall. For these people, Israelis are murderers.

It is easy to be cynical. If I was to count the number of times I am supposed to have carried out genocide, the Palestinians would be equivalent in numbers to those in India or even China.

So how can I prove my point that Israelis are really just like any other people, looking to live a life full of fun and in peace?

Enter Aussie rules football. Now for those of you not used to this sport, you may consider “peace” and Aussie rules (or Footy) a contradiction in terms. I was first introduced to the sport some years ago via a film called “The Game”, which made the battle of the Somme look like a Sunday afternoon picnic.

But no. The Shimon Peres Center for Peace brought the game to Israel. It recruited 20 Israelis and 20 Palestinians. They trained together near Jerusalem and sent a joint team to an international tournament in Melbourne.

What did this mean on the field? A great story is Nasser Gus, who had served a jail sentence for firing on Israeli soldiers. He partnered up with religious Jews living in the West Bank. The actual results seem less important than the political and social bonds formed.

This Sunday night, a documentary film will be screened in Jerusalem, showing how the idea moved from a wild though all the way to reality. As the director observed in a newspaper interview, this is a direct lesson in seizing an opportunity, despite considerable social obstacles constantly being shoved in your face.

As for the detractors on WordPress reading this, they should ask themselves why this film is not currently being shown on the West Bank or in Gaza. And they should consider why if Israelis keep coming up with programmes for coexistence, how come there are few equivalent Palestinian initiatives?

President Obama turned up in Cairo and asked the Muslim world to recognise that America is not an evil giant. He also called on his listeners to find an alternative to violence and bloodshed, especially when it comes to the Israeli – Palestinian issue.

As Obama pointed out, the revolutions in South Africa and elsewhere were eventually accomplished through peaceful means and not through the barrel of a gun. It is time for the Arab world to deal with Israel as a living and continuous reality.

International media has focused on Israel’s reaction. In today’s Hebrew newspapers, Netanyahu is quoted as saying that partial building in settlements will continue, as per an agreement with George Bush. that does not sound good to much of the outside world.

But how have Arab governments reacted?

Egypt wanted to ban Obama’s live broadcast on the state television. Hamas and the Palestinian Authority have welcomed the pressure on Israel, but not much more. From other countries, silence. No official comment.

And here’s the catch. Because to talk to Israel is a psychological anathema for most Arab leaders and their peoples. When Israel was created in 1948, it had no formal borders, as none of its neighbours recognised it. In place was a series of armistices, but nothing permanent.

And after the 6 Day War, the Arabs were united under the Khartoum Declaration of 1st September 1967: no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with Israel – the infamous 3 “noes”!

Since then, Israel has convinced Egypt and Jordan to sign full peace accords, partially breaking that physche. However, it is a cold peace. Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran and others have more than replaced the hatred from Cairo and Amman. 

Initial indications are that Obama has failed to induce his listeners to accept Israel. Without that, a significant move from Israel will be a solo waltz towards a change in the regional balance of power.

This past week, I was sent three seemingly unrelated yet inspirational articles. With an extra cup of strong coffee this morning, their real message hit me. When combined, they make for fascinating reading.

Let’s start with failure. This facebook link shows how many of the popular heroes of history have suffered failure in those areas, when their mythos would have us believe otherwise. The motto? Without failure, you have not lived and you then have an increased chance to go on to success.

Now go to another corner. Rabbi Hammer  is a resident of Sderot, famous for being constantly shelled  from Gaza. He probably leads a very different life to the gentleman who posted the item on failure. The rabbi has commented on his exasperation in dealing with his teenage children, unusual for a man who is supposed to have all the answers to family distress situations. More failure, yes?

Hammer found his way out of the conumdrum by looking at how others have succeeded in similar situations. Love can be maintained and expressed, even when you disagree, possibly disagree fundamentally. Anger is sometimes an emotional disguise for a desperation to get it right together.

My third story relates to a reality TV series. 2 povactive, rude, intelligent British teenagers were taken to Israel and placed for a week in the home of an ultra-orthodox, socially conservative family.  The result was an extremely volatile week, where two beautiful youths learnt how to convert their weaknesses into strengths.

So, your past may not have brought you the success or peace of mind you deserve. You probably have the clarity to know that you really want to achieve that success. the question is how to manage and develop your skills towards a successful future.

Is this what Obama is telling leaders of the Middle East? More to the point; is he really ignoring them, but engaging with the people at large? The past is full of war and hate – that is not a sign of triumph.

Believe it or not, Israel sells nearly US$4 billion of produce and services to Palestinians every year. In return, Israel imports about US$1 billion, as well as employs tens of thousands of labourers.

Ofir Gendelman is the CEO of the new Israel Palestinian Chamber of Commerce. In a recent interview, he noted how the 2 economies are very much inter-related.

Most of the products sold in Palestinian markets are Israeli. West Bank supermarkets stock mainly goods made by Israeli companies such as Osem, Strauss and Elite. For the Palestinians, most trade at the end of the day is with Israel.

Personally, I have seen this cooperation in practice. This week, I was asked to speak to a Palestinian, developing a finance project. And earlier this month I attended the Agritech exhibition in Tel Aviv, where there was clear interest in the Palestinian sector.

This mutuality is a great way of creating trust and of building towards peace. One of the factors stopping this exciting prospects is…… wait for it…. academics. Yes, the university champions of this world see this progress as dangerous.

How so? Take the UK union of lecturers. It wants to propose a boycott of Israel and encourage divestment. The potential net result?

Well, you could imagine the flow diagram: The Israeli economy would suffer. This will have a knock-on effect, firstly on Israel’s neighbours. And Palestinian militants will see that if they attack again, not only will they not be punished, it will be the Israelis who will be told off for retaliating. And round we go again.

Now, that explanation may be too complicated for your average intellectual delegate of university lecturers. But their pensive decision-making is going to hit adversely the dinar in the pockets of Palestinians, the very people they want to help.

How would I grade that policy? F for failure. 

Helping the Palestinians will require joint efforts and not one-way messages of hate.

Ken Loach is a brilliant British film director. That is a precious skill, because cinematography is a key medium to ensure that holders of differing opinions communicate with each other. And Loach has an excellent history of bringing difficult subjects to the attention of big screen viewers.

This week, Loach spat in the eyes of his own profession. He actively and successfully campaigned to ensure that the Edinburgh International Film Festival did not receive a small grant to feature an Israeli film.

The film is a romance set in a sex-therapy clinic, and makes no reference to war or politics. It recently won an award for Best Film at Israel’s International Women’s Film Festival. The film is produced by a Tel Aviv University student

So what? Loach was looking to ban Israeli participation.

EIFF had commented that: “Not accepting support from one particular country ‘would set a dangerous precedent by politicising what is a wholly cultural and artistic mission. We are firm believers in free cultural exchange, and do not feel that ghettoising filmmakers or restricting their ability to communicate artistically on the basis that they come from a troubled territory is of any benefit.”

A few days later, the organisers capitulated, pathetically.

The actions of Loach are detestable. He claims that his argument against Israel is based on the country’s excessive force. If that were true, why does he not complain about Palestinians to the same degree? With true irony, as he was campaigning, rockets landed on people’s homes in Sderot, southern Israel.

Loach is a hypocrite. By isolating one group of people in the global society to relieve his hatred, he opens himself to the accusal of racism. He copies tactics employed by those who have hated Jews over the centuries, and wraps in acceptable 21st century spin.

The acclaimed director has learnt how to control the communication of others.

I bet that Ken Loach cultivated his political activism partially on the works on George Orwell, the author of 1984.

One key message of Orwell’s philosophy was the need to speak out when people try to clamp dows on freedom of expression. Loach has crossed that line of human decency.

So you think that Obama’s policy is new and exciting? You believe that Bibi Netanyahu is not talking about a 2-state solution? Scrap the spin and let’s get real.

Over 50 years ago, before Obama was even born, TV legend Mike Wallace took on Abba Eban in a powerful interview. Ebanwas one of the diplomatic greats of the Twentieth Century and who represented Israel for decades.

It is compulsive viewing. Despite taking place before the Arabs launched the 6 Day War, when Israel gained control of the West Bank, the arguments are directly paralleled to those of the present. Israel is aggressive, does not seek peace, is an economic disaster, and all the rest.

In response, Eban set out the cold truths. Seek peace with Israel and we can all live together in prosperity. No rhetoric. That’s how it should be.

In effect, this is the commitment that Obama was seeking from Netanyahu. This is what Obama will tell the Arab world and Israel in Cairo on June 4th, almost 42 years to the day when Nasser declared war on Israel.

Bibi can bluster that he did not cave in during his visit to Washington. However, he has already accepted the Road Map of Bush. Everybody knows that includes a 2-state end game. The media is left to quibble over the semantic finesse.

So where is the difficult bit in the peace puzzle? It is called the Palestinian leadership.

President Mahmoud Abbas is the next politician expected to catch a flight to the White House. To get a state with territorial continuity, all he has to do is:- (A) Say yes to Obama and (B) Deliver on his promises, eliminating terror and that includes controlling Hamas. 

(The Iranian nuclear threat is serious but is a side issue in this context,  even though Tehran will do its utmost to confuse matters through its proxies in Hamas and Hizbollah).

And this is where Abba Eban may have the last word. In 1983, he wrote:

They (the Palestinians) have never missed a chance of losing an opportunity. They have persistently rejected proposals conceived largely in their interest…

Obama has learnt well from Eban and from Wallace. for all the poor analysis of the press, the American President has quietly placed all the real pressure on the Palestinians. They have to deliver in the name of international peace. 

Well that was simple enough, wasn’t it?

I have long opposed aid for the Palestinians, when it inexclicably seems to disappear down a black hole. Donors and intended recipients become the victims to the owners of greed and violence.

So it is refreshing to come across some positive news.

Tonight, the Israel Palestinian Chamber of Commerce will hold a gala dinner. 

Guests of honour at the event will be President Shimon Peres, Tony Blair, official Envoy of the Quartet on the Middle East and his wife Cherie Blair, the Vice Prime Minister and Minister for Regional Development Silvan Shalom and Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon.

If this role of honour is impressive, of more importance for me is the sign of Palestinian commercial interests beginnings to take a lead. This is the beginnings of the creation of an independent economy, which looks to build wealth through normality and not via political dominance.

For example, The Portland Foundation is working in the Ramallah region, building new affordable homes. In a secondary field, they are developing long-term savings schemes. 

(Place this against the number of senior Palestinian officials, who have been accused of controlling the cement industry or similar rackets.)

Maybe Obama and Netanyahu should start by fostering similar positive schemes, create a stable framework, and then go for a comprehensive peace arrangement.

It seems that the international community has finally found a way to channel money to the Palestinians in a manner that clearly gets around the “Hamas factor”.

The aim seems to be to use UN institutions. Clearly even the Saudis have been worried, as there hundreds of millions is still in Riyahd as opposed to Palestinian bank accounts.

Certainly this is a positive step. But it begs one horrible question. What has happened to the money until now?

The Funding for Peace Coalition long campaigned for greater transparency and accountability of Western tax payers money going into Gaza and into Ramallah. EU, UNWRA, USAID and others have all invested billions.

We know that Arafat died as one of the wealthiest men in the Middle East. Crawl the web and you will find that he son of President Abbas has been censured for his new-found wealth. Hamas has finessed the art of smuggling, profiting on the building of the tunnel, their use, and the goods eventually sold.

A recent convert to this need for monitoring has been the Taxpayers Alliance. In a report released last month, the group detailed how the EU in particular funds a Palestinian educational curriculum filled with direct and indirect hatred.

To quote the key findings: –

  • Over €729 million of EU taxpayers’ money spent on aid to the Palestinian territories each year.
  • Donations to the Palestinian territories create a responsibility to ensure that the Palestinian Authority does not misuse its budget. That responsibility exists whether EU taxpayers are directly supporting the promotion of hatred and violence, providing the Palestinian Authority with funds that it can use to do the same or providing services that Palestinian authorities would otherwise be expected to provide, freeing up their budget to use as they like.
  • 42% of the Palestinian population are under 15 years old.
  • The Palestinian media is dominated by official newspapers, radio stations and television channels, paid for by the Palestinian Authority’s budget which is in turn supported by British donations. That media frequently broadcasts statements that advocate the continuation of violent struggle instead of pursuing peace.
  • Breakdown of the €729 million: €420m from the EU; €67m – France; €67m -Sweden; €55m -Germany; €27m -Italy; €93m – the UK.

The point? Well, tax collection by the Palestinian Authority and by Hamas is negligent. So if they are going to use other people’s money, especially in tight times as today, they should have the decency to use it on morally justifiable measures, which will feed into a genuine peace process.

Yesterday, Pope Benedictus XVI commenced his vist of Israel, arousing a certain degree of disappointment.

Off stage, Israel’s Prime Minister, Bibi Netanyahu, was opening himself up for criticism. Ostensibly, Bibi was in Egypt, talking with Mubarak. However, the much of the local media was concentrating on his capitulation of his economic plan.

Step back for a moment and recall. First, Bibi’s election promises included lower taxes. Second, he has appointed a finance minister who will play second fiddle to Bibi’s role of economic supremo. Third, as usual in formulating a new budget, the Finance Ministry leaked details of cuts and frightening new measures.

And what are we left with? Well, according to the papers, cuts in child allowances, hospital payments, less tax breaks for working women, etc have all flown out the window. Meanwhile, VAT could go up by 1%, a direct burden on the poorer members of the community.

It is not clear if Bibi buckled to the pressure of interest groups like rich trades unions or industrialists. However, even during his own successful term as Finance Minister some years ago, he was also known to cave in.

Which brings me back to Bibi’s meeting with Mubarak. And in a few days time with Obama, and then with the Palestinians. Bibi’s skillful oratory is not in doubt. It is his ability to deliver a safe economy and …….well long-term overall safety that concerns me more. It is time for leadership.

I recently came across a wonderful book: “Not In My Name: A Compendium of Modern Hypocrisy”, written by Chas Newkey-Burden and Julie Burchill, and published by Virgin Books.

The section on Israel was written by Burden and can be found at: https://www.oyvagoy.com/israel. The author asks a challenging question.

The anti-Israel brigade would have us believe that the motivation for this vitriolic hatred of Israel is a genuine, compassionate concern for the fate of the Palestinian people. But do they really care about the Palestinians, or is their compassion somewhat selective, to put it politely? In reality, are they only interested in Palestinian suffering for as long as it gives them an opportunity to bash Israel?

As Burden notes: When Palestinian women are stabbed to death in “honour killings” across the West Bank and Gaza Strip, no anti-Israel Westerners lose a single moment’s sleep on their behalf.

So what?

Well, yesterday, I read about a new and challenging extension of this hypocrisy.

UNRWA was set up 60 years ago to help Palestinians and their social problems. It has a standing annual budget of over US$400m, which is regularly topped up for special campaigns. European taxpayers are particularly generous donors. Even since Israel left Gaza in 2005, UNRWA has still to resettle even one refugee outside the camps.

Israel and her supporters have been consistently critical of UNRWA and its increasingly political role. The Lindsay Report is the best documented comment to that effect.

In return, UNRWA through John Ging, its chief rep in Gaza, has never pulled its punches. The most notable occasion was during the January war in Gaza, when UNRWA claimed that Israel has deliberately shelled a school killing 42 civilians. UNRWA is proud of its record of supporting schools, funding school books, founding clinics and far more on behalf of Palestinians. It openly accepts that Hamas is its partner in Gaza, and works with this proscribed organisation.

And yet: Well, we all know that the 42 turned into 12, and 9 of those were Hamas operatives. Christopher Gunness, an UNRWA spokesperson, had to censure Hamas for stealing aid during the war. Ging has just called on the Western and Arab communities to deliver on its aid pledges to Gaza.

And now for the hypocrisy. For all the bending over backwards to help the Palestinians, often deliberately cooperating in tandem with militias, Ging has been censured by Hamas.

In effect, on 16th April, the Hamas paper “Felesteen” called on Ging to resign, as he opposes the “resistance”. His crime is his efforts to work within UN ethical standards. In other words, the man whose job is to funnel millions of Western money into Hamas projects is now seen as a traitor, because he is calling for transparency and opposing some of the violent methods.  

Fortunately for Hamas, Obama is currently trying to see it included in a new Fatah government. European politicians are also queuing up to visit its leaders, as they refuse to even consider recognising Israel. Phew, no hypocrisy here, either.

This week, Israel marks two important days in the calendar; Remembrance Day and Independence Day.

The former honours 22,437 civilians and members of Israeli security services killed since 1948. Rabbi Ari Kahn noted in his article on facebook that one of the strongest blessings that he can offer to soldiers and to all Israelis is that “they return home safely along with all their comrades, and live normal lives …..” .

When you balance those remarks with current trends in the peace process, they take on greater significance. President Abbas appears to be retreating on previous commitments to recognise Israel. In the words of an official from the Israeli Foreign Ministry: –

The Palestinians cannot negotiate for a two-state solution where one is Palestinian and the other is Palestinian-to-be. This is essential; it is the choice between ending the conflict or failing to end the conflict.”

Yes, Israelis are still very much in need of the blessing of peace. The IDF Chief of Staff, Gabi Ashkenazi commented this week how: 

Even after dozens of years of struggle, we have still not lost our hope to live by your side in peace and mutual respect; but I don’t recommend that anyone tests the strength and determination of the IDF.

In direct contrast, as we review Israel’s celebrations for her 61st year, we can see just how much President Abbas has to learn from his adversary. The official event to start the 24 hours of celebrations saw the customary participation of all parts of society, including Druze and Bedouin. Pluralism at its best.

But it is more than that. Israel is a beautiful country. In the winter, you can ski on the Hermon, and then a few hours later you can sunbathe in Eilat. In Jerusalem, you can almost literally walk back thousands of years and touch elements belonging to the First Temple Period. Israeli technology is literally universal, as she has become one of the few countries to possess satellite capabilities.

Israel’s modern history is replete with triumphs, which others would be proud of, but have difficulty in bringing themselves to acknowledge.

Israel has many blessings to offer other peoples and nations around the globe. All are welcome to receive them in peace and with good health. They too have much to celebrate from Israel’s 61 years of independence.

Rainfall in the Middle East has always been an issue. This year, the winter rains in the region have been around 20-25% below average, and that average itself has been in constant retreat for some years.

So when the World Bank issues a report stating that  “Israel extracts 50% more water from the aquifers it shares with the Palestinian authority than it is authorised to do so”, ears prick up.

Double back to a detailed report from the office of the Israeli Water Commissioner. It carefully details the obligations of all sides under the 1993 Oslo Accords, and who has fulfilled what. In brief, Israel has gone way beyond the letter and spirit of the agreements in helping the Palestinians.

It is the Palestinians, who have yet to drill or to operate half the required wells in the Eastern Aquifer. And in the Northern District, they have sunk over 250 illegal wells.

But here’s the killer fact. Over 60% of Palestinian sewage is deliberately not treated. Its run off contaminates into the already precious reserves of water, rivers or lakes.

An internet search will show how loads of NGOs and other pressure groups have sunk tons of resources, research, man-hours, money into deligitimising Israel’s use of water. I personally have had correspondence with such activists over the years. If all that investment had been turned away from hate and ploughed into coexistence, much of the Palestinian water shortage could have been resolved.

How so?

Take Cequesta, a small Israeli company, based just outside Jerusalem. Using environmentally friendly tech, it recycles water from industrial or other use. The systems are not expensive, support the environment and provide a clear solution to populations with water shortages.

Whether it be Cequesta or other solutions, the Palestininas have much to gain from cooperating with the Israelis. They only people to lose out will be those determined to see Israel suffer, whatever the cost to truth.

On Tuesday, I went for a wonderful walk in the midst of Samaria. Today, I finally realised what was disturbing me about the trip. For all the beauty of the nature, what I also saw was the very core of the Israeli – Palestinian conflict. For either side, it is no way to live (NWTL).

What do I mean?

 The walk itself was along the banks of the River Shilo. Spring flowers were out in full, and their colours won over the hearts of even your sarcastic author. The last winter rains mixed with some early summer sunshine ensured we were surrounded by a lush green backdrop.

The town of Shilo is nearby, built near the ancient city where the Tabernacle or Mishkan was located. This is holy for many different religions.

So why the phrase NWTL?

To get there, we travelled north out of Jerusalem along Route 60. Palestinian and Israeli drivers happily took turns breaking the speed limit. Each had their own number plates. Each was able to move freely to where they wanted. Fine, but then look again.

Under current peace proposals, Israel will be asked to surrender control of Shilo. Jews will not be allowed to return to a key holy site nor have access to the nature trail I trapsed. NWTL.

Sure Palestinians were zooming freely up and down the road. But on the edge of Jerusalem, they have to undergo security checks to visit friends and family. NWTL.

The security checks are staffed by young 18-20 year old soldiers, who are being asked to make immediate and sensitive decisions, all day every day. Not a fair imposition, leading to unsatisfactory results for all. NWTL.

Looking at the Palestinian villages from a distance and comparing them to the set up of Israeli towns, you can see that the Palestinian Authority is clearly unable (and unwilling) to invest resources in their social development. NWTL.

The route back to Jerusalem was poorly marked, and Israeli drivers nearly caused accidents as they desperately tried to ensure not to take an incorrect turn and thus drive into the wrong village. Who needs that danger or fear? Who needs to be humiliated by these drivers? NWTL.

The list goes on. But do not misunderstand me. Israelis have rights like any other people on the planet – to live their social /religious dream in peace and security. In parallel, the Palestinians deserve better.

And here’s the punchline. As Obama is sucked in to the depths of office, his lackies are also beginning to resort to the spin of the past. They are clearly gearing up to pressure the new Israeli government, assuming that this will bring results.

BUT, the fact is that there is no peace plan – Saudi, American, Israeli, European, etc – that gives a full and genuine resolution to these on-going subjects described here.

World leaders, including Israelis and Palestinians, must start to engage with those real, day-to-day, and on-the-ground issues, and in a manner that replaces rhetoric for realism and multi-level understanding. Then, maybe, we will see a sustainable peace process emerging for the Middle East.

Obama, Miliband and co have yet to reach that stage.

I am increasingly asked why people want to boycott Israel.

Ignoring outright anti-semites, what makes somebody deliberately want to isolate the sole proclaimed democracy in the Middle East? So I invite you to take a few minutes and join me in analysing the background and to come up with a solid intellectual argument.

Background:

Briefly, Arab countries have been demanding a boycott of Israel, even prior to its creation in 1948, at least 19 years before the issue of the West Bank cropped up. And this demand includes a wish to force non-Arab countries to comply with sanctions against Israel.

Skipping forward to the current decade, left-wing activists have taken the lead in calling for a boycott, primarily in Britain.

1)      Trades Unions have repeatedly called for universities not to employ Israeli academics, specifically if they do not comply with a set political point of view.

2)      NGOs have encouraged the British government to demand from retailers that all goods manufactured in Palestinian territories are clearly labeled, way beyond what the EU has agreed with Israel. (The government has reverted to the spin of saying it is responding to consumer pressure, although that abstract has never been proven).

3)      The influential Cooperative Movement in the UK, which sponsors several MPs, is under increasing pressure to boycott Israeli goods.

4)      Where the UK leads, Canada follows. There is a growing movement to launch an academic boycott and stop the import of Israeli wines.

5)      A few Australian professors have also felt a need to climb on to the bandwagon.

6)      In America, Motorola (Israel) sales have been plagued by Palestinian campaigners.

7)      You can search utube for films of how campaigners violently tear Israeli goods of the shelves of French supermarkets or terrorise vendors of Israeli products in UK shopping malls.

8)      The Dutch Labour Party is demanding that Israel talks to Hamas or face sanctions.

So Why Boycott:

Let’s look at 4 possible reasons.

1)      To promote human rights.

Well in that case, there would be calls to boycott 50% of the countries in the world, yes? Type the word “boycott” into google. Around 95 out of the first 100 entries refer to Israel – note “Israel” and not just a call to boycott goods made in the Palestinian territories alone.

It can be assumed that most of these activists are content to accept the repression in Zimbabwe, the slaughter of Christians in Sudan, the racism of Venezuela, or even the totalitarianism of several Islamic regimes including Hamas. For example, the Dutch Labour Party has made no equivalent demand on any Arab party in the conflict.

2)      To help Palestinians.

Israel’s trade union organization, the Histadrut, has a long and strong tradition of working with minority sectors, including Palestinians. They have estimated that a boycott of Israeli products manufactured in Palestinian territories will immediately affect approx 25,000 Palestinian workers.

·         This figure does not include dependants and family member, ensuring that the figure rises towards 150,000.

·         Behind the stat is the fact that these wages are relatively high for the Palestinian sector.

·         Threatened economic instability will threaten new investment.

·         And a boycott of Israel is likely to hit at those sectors that employ tens of thousands of Palestinians working within the pre-1967 armistice agreements.

 

3)      To stop Israel’s violence towards the Palestinians.

This is certainly a noble objective. However, the narrative ignores that fact that most of Israel’s policy in Gaza or elsewhere is based on response. For example, the military action in Gaza in January 09 followed a refusal by Hamas to renew a ceasefire and after 8,000 rockets had landed in Israel over 8 years.

Sanction supporters might have created some credence if they issued a similar demand to boycott Fatah, Hamas and Hizbollah for their violence against Israeli and local civilians. But that balance is consistently lacking in all the arguments.

4)      To help peace

Again highly praiseworthy: But we know that trade between nations and peoples helps to foster understanding and progress. A boycott seals off those very opportunities for all sides.

Boycott’s Raison d’Etre:

So, once you tear away the spin of all these excuses, what are you left with? I looked at the website of Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC). The senior team reads like a “who’s who” of participants of trendy causes since the early 1960s. With a couple of exceptions, I would not associate any of them with being anti-semitic. There are even some non-practicising Jews.

BUT, if you compare the language of the website, it reads strikingly similar to that of the Arab League of the 1940s. Then, these people called for: –

 “Jewish products and manufactured goods shall be considered undesirable..” thus declared the Arab League Council on December 2, 1945. All Arab “institutions, organizations, merchants, commission agents and individuals” were called upon “to refuse to deal in, distribute, or consume Zionist products or manufactured goods.”

 

And the difference with today’s cries against Israel? Very little, as PSC site describes. It is the same venomous hatred as 60+ years ago, except that the spin today is more subtle and comes from politically acceptable Western celebs.

History will judge any future boycott as a triumph of evil; a deliberately racist tool, based on a combination of misinformation, phobias and enmity.

Today, I was in the Old City of Jerusalem. I had the opportunity to celebrate the Bar Mitzvah of my youngest son in one of the many special, renovated Synagogues in he area . In fact, we had started the festivites a month previously, when we prayed as a family at the Wailing Wall (Kotel) nearby.

And as we all know, upto 1967, such actions would have been impossible. Jews were not allowed in these areas.

Tragically, as my wife, children, friends and others were dancing, 25 miles away, a 13 year old boy was hacked to death. The youth,  unknown to me, was barely a few months older than my son. His crime? According to Hamas, the attack was a “natural reaction to Israel’s occupation”.

There are angry protesters all over the world, yet none of them resort to repugnant acts of slaughter, a pick axe to slay a youth. If this is Hamas’s definition of normality and acceptability, I wonder what it takes for them to consider something inhuman!

Now consider that in a few weeks time, Pope Benedict XVI will visit Jerusalem and the Holy Land. It is less than a decade since his predecessor was here. As then, this trip will be a tremendous opportunity to show just how pluralism really does work in this minute part of the Middle East.

If the Pope is allowed out of his bullet proof vehicle, he will be able to see what I witnessed on the way to Synagogue this morning. We walked passed the entrance to Dormition Abbey, where pilgrims were mingling happily. A few yards along, the Armenian Quarter was thriving with tourists. And beyond, the minarets were calling their followers to prayers.

Obama, the EU and others are signalling to Israel to make quick and significant concessions to Hamas and to Fatah. Yet for all their so-called protection of Israel’s future, the international community continues to seek a way to appease the violence of Palestinian warriors.

The Pope will not be visiting Gaza. The treatment of Christians there in the past decade, and particularly since the takeover by Hamas, has been a continuous story of religious harassment.

And if Israel were to agree to the demands of America et al on Jerusalem, then my children will not be celebrating their weddings at the Wailing Wall. So if you want to keep Jerusalem open to all, then as the Pope will discover, do not change what already works.

Client Feedback

"Michael transformed the way I think and approach working, and also how to monetize my social media and communal projects."

CEO of digital media company

"Michael helped my high tech company take off."

CEO of clean energy start up

"Michael has been an invaluable resource to me throughout all of the steps of starting up my business."

Art Studio owner

“Working with Michael Horesh is like having root canal treatment, marriage counselling and business coaching all rolled into one, successfully.”

CEO of digital media company
CEO of clean energy start up
Art Studio owner